a public service announcement
Oooh, I’ve run into folks who, for what ever reason, have remained totally loyal to the RBY primary set while being totally knowledgeable about the CMY primary set.
If you’re worth your salt in mixing paints, you can make both RBY and CMY palettes do your bidding well enough. All of my traditional paintings are done with only the three primaries, and white. While I personally prefer CMY, I’ve had to work with RBY before, and (though I was mega rusty) I didn’t find it any more difficult to produce the colors I wanted.
If you’re working on very strict graphic design projects and need need NEED very specific colors (while, for what ever god forsaken reason, having to do it all with traditional paints/inks instead of digital mediums), then CMY is the better way to go. But if you’re just painting illustrations and are under no pressure to be mega mega mega nitpicky about the color purity, it’s really not going to make a difference.
So, read the info-graphic, and take it in. Play with a CMY primary set, etc. But if you’ve been working with RBY all this time, are comfortable with it, enjoy working with RBY, and feel like you’ve been getting the colors you want with RBY, don’t panic. You haven’t been fooled, nor have you been lying to yourself or anything like that. You’re doing just fine.
The difference between using RBY and CMY is very particular, and most people (if any) won’t even be able to tell if a painting was done with RBY or CMY. (But they WILL be able to tell if you used a black straight from the tube, ooooh).
^ last comment. Thanks.
This is very important if you’re ever in a situation similar this pretend that you’re dead don’t scream and @#!*%
my dad told us this if someone shoots up our school
PLEASE REMEMBER THIS
not even a joke we learned this in Police Explorers and put it on your clothing as well but go quickly because you don’t know where the person is.
You know, in Mexico some cartels double tap cadavers just in case someone’s doing that.
i like this but i don’t fully understand it…
you don’t understand how sad this is. each adult is a cross, and each child has been crucified by said cross.
- the priest (i assume he’s a priest, correct me if i’m wrong) killed the little boy in one way or another, probably rape, which is common among corrupted clergy men.
- the tourist comes to an overcrowded, poverty stricken country, taking up any and all resources that could have gone to the little native girl
- the soldier comes to fight for his country, but ends up killing the innocent girl, probably in her village.
- the little boy dies under the doctor’s knife
- the man kills the little girl in a school shooting (represented with the uniform)
- the “fat” kid is killed by obesity caused by a fast food epidemic in america, most commonly mcdonald’s, shown by ronald mcdonald himself.
this is /haunting/ to look at. children can die at anyone’s hand. even the “heros”
Actually the kids crucified in the backs of those men represent the victims of different kinds of movements: The work by Erik Ravelo is reporting child abuse suffered by children, due to conflicts in Syria, Thailand, United States and Japan, sexual abuse tarnishes the Vatican and obesity related to McDonald’s.
And that is all…
Voy a llorar tanto a tal grado que se me sequen los ojos y no pueda volver a llorar nunca más.srta. pms